Skip to main content

Ribbon

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Glossary
  • News & media
Fair Work Commission logo

Fair Work Commission

Australia's national workplace relations tribunal
Search is closed
Menu is closed

Search

Main menu

  • Awards & agreements
    • Minimum wages & conditions
    • Awards
    • Agreements
    • Legislation & regulations for awards & agreements
  • Cases, decisions & orders
    • Major cases
    • Summaries of significant decisions
    • Decisions by keywords
    • FWC Bulletin
    • Archived decisions & orders
    • Transcripts
    • Court reviews
    • Historical cases
  • Registered organisations
    • Fact sheets, templates & webinars
    • Find registered organisations
    • Find State-recognised associations
    • Registration
    • Running a registered organisation
    • Entry permits
    • Industrial action
    • Gazette notices
    • Lodgment
  • Resources
    • Online lodgment
    • Forms
    • Where to get legal help
    • Research
    • Workplace Relations Education Series
    • Benchbooks
    • Fact sheets, guides & videos
    • Practice notes
    • Resources in other languages
    • Case studies
    • Quarterly practitioner updates
    • Related sites
  • Termination of employment
    • Unfair dismissal
    • General protections dismissal
    • Unlawful termination
    • How the Commission works
  • Disputes at work
    • Fairness in the workplace
    • Resolving issues at the Commission
    • JobKeeper disputes
    • General protections (unlawful actions)
    • Anti-bullying
    • Cooperative Workplaces
    • Industrial action
    • Awards & enterprise agreements disputes
    • Disputes about entry
    • How the Commission works
  • Home
  • Anti-bullying benchbook
Back to top

Anti-bullying benchbook

An overview of legal procedure & case law

What are the outcomes?

Print this page

 

Table of contents

On this page

  • Orders to stop bullying
  • Who can an order be made against?
  • What can be ordered
  • What cannot be ordered
  • Considerations
  • Outcomes arising from investigations by another person or body
  • Case example
  • Procedures available to the worker to resolve grievances or disputes
  • Any matters the Commission considers relevant
  • Case examples
  • References

 

Orders to stop bullying

 See Fair Work Act s.789FF

The Fair Work Commission can make any order it considers appropriate (other than an order requiring a financial payment) to prevent a worker from being bullied at work by an individual or group of individuals.

Before an order can be made, a worker must have made an application for an order to stop bullying and the Commission must be satisfied that:

  • the worker has been bullied at work by an individual or group of individuals, and
  • there is a risk that the worker will continue to be bullied at work by the individual or group.[1]

Where a finding of bullying conduct is made and there is some future risk, preventative orders would be expected to follow. Such orders would, in appropriate cases, establish the appropriate basis for future mutually safe and constructive relationships.[2]

An order to stop bullying is directed at preventing the worker being bullied at work. The Commission is specifically prohibited from making an order requiring the payment of a pecuniary amount, so it cannot make an order requiring a respondent to pay an amount of compensation to an applicant. The anti-bullying laws are not directed at punishing past bullying behaviour or compensating the victims of such behaviour. It is directed at stopping future bullying behaviour.[3]

 

Who can an order be made against?

Section 789FF of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Fair Work Act) does not expressly state the entities that can be included in any order. However, it is likely that the provision empowers the Commission to make orders directed to applicants, the individuals whose behaviour has led to the application and their respective employer(s)/principal(s).

The orders are directed at the conduct leading to the finding of bullying behaviour and this would mean that the applicant and the individuals concerned could be subject to such an order.

The anti-bullying measures are primarily underpinned by the corporations power (s.789FD(3)). On the basis of the Work Choices Case[4] and previous case law on the corporations power, that power will support regulation of the activities of a corporation and the imposition of obligations upon it, regulation of the conduct of its employees and regulation of others whose conduct is capable of affecting its activities.[5]

The broad scope of the orders is also supported by the fact that a finding of risk to the applicant’s health and safety is required in any finding of bullying and the Explanatory Memorandum clearly contemplates orders being made against the relevant employer/principal(s).

Where the parties agree that orders should be made and the Commission is satisfied that bullying conduct has taken place and that there is a risk of further bullying, consent orders may be issued by the Commission.

What can be ordered

The power of the Commission to grant an order is limited to preventing the worker from being bullied at work, and the focus is on resolving the matter and enabling normal working relationships to resume.[6]

The power to make orders is relatively broad and the Commission can made any orders that it considers appropriate (other than an order requiring the payment of a pecuniary amount) to prevent the workers from being bullied. In circumstances where an applicant worker is suffering from a medical condition that prevents a return to the workplace without some appropriate modifications, the Commission would consider including such measures within an order.[7]

The range of orders that the Commission may make (as contemplated by the Explanatory Memorandum) include orders requiring:

  • the individuals or group to stop the specified behaviour
  • regular monitoring of behaviours by an employer
  • compliance with an employer’s anti-bullying policy
  • the provision of information and additional support and training to workers, and
  • a review of the employer’s workplace bullying policy.[8]

Orders will not necessarily be limited or apply only to the employer, but could also apply to others involved. Orders could be based on behaviour such as threats made outside the workplace, if the threats relate to work.[9]

Orders that might be considered by the Commission in an anti-bullying application could deal with specific future conduct of relevant individuals, including the applicant. In addition, orders might be considered that go to the broader conduct within, and culture of, a workplace. These could include the establishment and implementation of appropriate anti-bullying policies, procedures and training, which would include confirming appropriate future conduct and behaviour.[10]

Physical and/or functional separation in the workplace of a person who has alleged that they have been bullied, and those said to have engaged in bullying conduct is self-evidently one way of preventing future bullying, although it may be a last resort where other practical measures will not be effective. A requirement that the employer place the person who has alleged that they have been bullied in an alternative position (or, alternatively, that a person found to have engaged in bullying conduct be redeployed elsewhere) in order to achieve such separation may be a legitimate incident of an order of this nature.[11]

The Commission is given wide powers to make preventative orders it considers appropriate. These powers must be informed by, but not necessarily limited to, the prior unreasonable conduct as found. However, any orders must be directed towards the prevention of the worker being bullied at work in the future by the individual or group concerned, be based upon appropriate findings, and have regard to the considerations established by s.789FF(2) of the Fair Work Act.[12]

Matters dealt with in orders of the Commission have included:

  • orders that individual parties:
    • not make contact with each other
    • only make contact via email during specific times
    • not attend certain premises
    • not denigrate or humiliate one another and behave in a way that is reasonable and professional
    • not deliberately or unreasonably delay the performance of work
    • maintain the confidentiality of the parties and their association with the terms of the order, or
    • refrain from making written and/or oral statements to each other or others that are abusive, offensive, or disparaging;
  • orders for companies:
    • to provide all staff with anti-bullying training
    • to conduct training for all employees on appropriate standards of behaviour in the workplace, including a recommendation that the training be conducted by, for example, the Anti-Discrimination Commission
    • to ensure they have in place updated anti-bullying policies and complaints handling procedures
    • to commission specific training for management personnel who will be investigating complaints about workplace bullying
    • to implement, and actively monitor, the effectiveness of control measures identified in risk assessments, or
    • to arrange for a Work Safe inspector to attend meetings with parties.[13]

What cannot be ordered

The Commission cannot order reinstatement or the payment of compensation or a pecuniary amount.[14]

An order for payment of a pecuniary amount may be one that requires a financial sum to be paid by one party to another. This can include fines and compensation.

The proposition that any order which potentially requires some monetary expenditure on the part of the employer falls foul of the exclusion in s.789FF(1) of the Fair Work Act must be rejected; were it otherwise, the scope of the power in s.789FF(1) would be narrowed to the extent of substantially defeating its purpose. It would mean, for example, that the types of orders identified in the Explanatory Memorandum might not be able to be made because they would likely have the effect of the employer incurring some monetary cost.[15]

An Order which has the effect of requiring the continuation of the payment of normal wages for work performed in the context of a continuing employment relationship does not fall within the exclusion in s.789FF(1) of the Fair Work Act.[16]

If the worker who makes the application is no longer working at the work site where the bullying conduct occurred, and there is no longer a risk that the worker who made the application will be bullied, the Commission will not be able to make an order under the anti-bullying provisions.

Considerations

When deciding what should be contained in an order to prevent further bullying behaviour, the Commission must, to the extent that it is aware, take into account:

  • any outcomes arising from an investigation into the matter by another person or body (whether that investigation is complete or not)
  • any procedures available to the worker to resolve grievances or disputes, and any outcomes arising from those procedures, and
  • any matters that the Commission considers relevant.[17]

By taking into account these factors, the Commission can seek to ensure consistency with any action being taken by other bodies (such as WHS state regulators).[18]

Outcomes arising from investigations by another person or body

A number of different persons and bodies have the power to deal with complaints of workplace bullying. The powers of each person or body and the way in which they deal with bullying complaints differ between organisations, as will the resulting remedies.

A worker who has made an application to the Commission for an order to stop bullying can also seek intervention by a WHS regulator under the WHS Act or the corresponding state or territory work health and safety laws.[19]

WHS regulators may respond to complaints in a number of ways consistent with their own internal policies. Regulators may send inspectors to workplaces to investigate incidents, issuing prohibition or improvement notices, seeking enforceable undertakings or prosecuting alleged offences against work health and safety laws.

Workplace bullying which involves criminal behaviour may also be the subject of a complaint to and investigation by the police.

Any outcomes arising from an investigation by such a person or body, that the Commission is aware of, must be taken into account by the Commission when making orders.[20]

Case example

Outcome arising from an investigation by another person or body considered

Re Ms SB

[2014] FWC 2104 (Hampton C, 12 May 2014).

Facts

The applicant managed a team of employees. It was alleged that two of the employees, who reported to the applicant, started behaving unreasonably towards the applicant by harassing her on a daily basis and spreading rumours about her in the workplace.

One of the employees made bullying allegations against the applicant (immediately prior to the applicant lodging this application). An investigation by a legal firm was arranged by the employer which found that the allegations against the applicant were justified in part, whereas the complaints by the applicant were not substantiated.

The applicant did not rely upon the legal firm’s investigation as evidence of bullying conduct in its own right, but as support for her proposition that there was a risk of ongoing bullying conduct; principally on the basis that no action was being proposed in relation to the employee.

Outcome

The Commission noted that, although the results of the investigation have been provided to the applicant and the Commission, the full report and evidence about how the investigation was conducted were not. The employer relied upon legal professional privilege in that regard. The Commission placed no weight upon the outcomes of the investigation as the apparent findings were at odds with certain findings made by the Commission from the evidence in relation to the applicant’s motives.

The Commission found that some of the behaviour was bordering upon unreasonable but not enough to fall within the scope of bullying behaviour as defined. As a result the Commission was not satisfied that the applicant had been bullied at work.

Relevance

The Commission found that the engagement of an external person to investigate both competing allegations was not unreasonable. There was also nothing unreasonable about the apparent general approach to the investigation adopted by the legal firm.

Procedures available to the worker to resolve grievances or disputes

This refers to any internal complaint mechanisms that may be available to the worker to resolve their grievance at the workplace level, without the Commission’s involvement; such as under a work health and safety law or an enterprise agreement or award.

Some workplaces will have policies which contain specific provisions on workplace bullying, such as how it is to be prevented and what action should be taken if it occurs. These may be contained within an enterprise agreement or a code of conduct.

The availability of alternative procedures does not necessarily mean that an application for orders to stop bullying cannot proceed. The new provisions were introduced to address the difficulty many workers face in trying to find a quick way to stop bullying so they do not suffer further harm or injury. The individual right of recourse has been provided for persons who are bullied at work to help resolve the matter quickly and inexpensively.[21]

Any matters the Commission considers relevant

If there are any other matters that the Commission considers to be relevant to the application, these must also be taken into account. This allows for other issues not specifically contemplated by the legislature to be taken into account where necessary, even though they don’t fall into one of the specific categories listed above.

This may include factors including:

  • the applicant being on leave from the workplace
  • that the individual(s) involved in the bullying behaviour are no longer in the workplace
  • that the bullying behaviour occurred or was otherwise set in a particular earlier context that no longer operates
  • positive initiatives put in place by the employer such as policies and procedures which have the effect of reducing whatever risk is otherwise present, or
  • any other developments in the workplace.[22]

Case examples

Orders NOT made – positive steps by employer

Re Ms LP

[2015] FWC 6602 (Hampton C, 4 November 2015).

[2016] FWC 763 (Hampton C, 12 February 2016).

Facts

The applicant was employed as a Food and Beverage Attendant at a family owned restaurant. She sought orders to stop certain alleged conduct by the group of individuals including orders for the employer to conduct management courses to be completed by the supervisors at the restaurant and for all staff to attend training in relation to bullying conduct.

The employer contended that the alleged conduct was not bullying but rather was reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner. The employer further contended that the Commission had no jurisdiction to consider the conduct of the former Head Chef and former Supervisor as they ceased working for the employer and there was no risk that the applicant would continue to be bullied by these individuals at work.

The employer submitted that, since some of the incidents had occurred, it had worked to develop a comprehensive set of policies about workplace bullying and appropriate workplace behaviour, and provided training in relation to these matters.

Outcome

The Commission was satisfied, on fine balance, that there was sufficient relevant unreasonable behaviour towards the applicant and/or the group of workers to which she belonged whilst at work to constitute bullying. However, much of that behaviour occurred in a particular context that had since changed and this would have an impact upon the appropriateness of any orders that might be considered in this matter.

The Commission was not persuaded that it could, or should, make orders in this matter, and sought further submissions from the parties on this issue.

In the subsequent decision the Commission determined that, given the history of the matter, the extent of positive measures that the employer has subsequently put into place as a result of the applications, and an understanding of the workplace and the relationships that had developed from hearing this matter, the Commission did not consider that the making of orders at this time would be conducive to the constructive resumption of working relationships. No orders were made.

Relevance

Where a finding of bullying conduct is made and there is some future risk, preventative orders would be expected to follow. Such orders would establish the appropriate basis for future mutually safe and constructive relationships.

In this case the Commission determined that making orders may not be beneficial in this situation, given the history of this particular matter and the extent of positive measures that the employer had subsequently put into place as a result of the applications.

Lacey and Kandelaars v Murrays Australia Pty Limited; Cullen

[2017] FWC 3136 (Roe C, 8 June 2017).

Facts

The two applicants were employed as bus drivers. They alleged bullying by their manager Mr Cullen and their employer. Mr Cullen and Murrays Australia offered joint defence to the applications and accepted that whilst Mr Cullen engaged in some inappropriate behaviour, they denied that the behaviour amounted to bullying.

Mr Cullen’s duties were altered so that he was no longer responsible for supervision of drivers, investigating incidents, assessing drivers or disciplining drivers and therefore there was no longer any risk that applicants would be bullied at work. He remained responsible for training drivers and may record breathalyser results from time to time.

The Commission was satisfied that the applicants’ allegations of bullying by Mr Cullen amounted to unreasonable behaviour and was not reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner. The Commission was satisfied that Mr Cullen bullied both applicants. 

Outcome
The Commission accepted that the change in Mr Cullen’s role in itself was not sufficient and considered that essential further step was to recognise that bullying had occurred. This was essential because:
  • it sent a strong message to Mr Cullen and should reduce the likelihood for further unreasonable action
  • it should assist the drivers affected to regain some confidence and dignity, and
  • it should assist management in taking the necessary steps to be more supportive of the drivers and to regain their confidence. 
 
The Commission also accepted that there was a serious risk that bullying conduct would continue. Ultimately the Commission held that bullying had occurred but an Order was not necessary or appropriate in this case.
Relevance

The Commission accepted that the risk of bullying conduct continuing was substantially reduced by the change in Mr Cullen’s role, and that it was not possible to avoid contact between the applicants and Mr Cullen. The Commission did not consider that an Order requiring complete separation between Mr Cullen and other drivers, and the applicants in particular, or requiring another person to always be present would be a practical or balanced response.

References

[1] Fair Work Act s.789FF(1).

[2] Re Ms LP [2016] FWC 763 (Hampton C, 12 February 2016) at para. 50.

[3] Re Ms McInnes [2014] FWCFB 1440 (Ross J, Hatcher VP, Hampton C, 6 March 2014) at para. 9.

[4] New South Wales v Commonwealth (Work Choices Case) [2006] HCA 52 (14 November 2006), (2006) 229 CLR 1].

[5] ibid., at para. 178.

[6] Revised Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013 at para. 120.

[7] Re G.C. [2014] FWC 6988 (Hampton C, 9 December 2014) at para. 168.

[8] Revised Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013 at para. 121.

[8] Revised Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013 at para. 119.

[10] Re Ms LP [2015] FWC 6602 (Hampton C, 4 November 2015) at para. 194; see also CF and NW [2015] FWC 5272 (Hampton C, 5 August 2015) at paras 31–34.

[11] South Eastern Sydney Local Health District v Lal [2019] FWCFB 1475 (Hatcher VP, Sams DP, Hampton C, 7 March 2019) at para. 24.

[12] Churches and Others v Jackson and Woods  [2016] FWCFB 2367 (O’Callaghan SDP, Clancy DP, Hampton C, 14 April 2016) at para 32.

[13] For examples see Applicant v Company A Pty Ltd; Company B Pty Ltd; and Third Respondent PR555521 (Williams C, 15 September 2014); CF and NW PR569997 (Hampton C, 30 July 2015); Roberts v VIEW Launceston Pty Ltd as trustee for the VIEW Launceston Unit Trust T/A View Launceston and Others PR573139 (Wells DP, 23 October 2015); Bowker and Others v DP World Melbourne Limited T/A DP World and Others PR574247 (Gostencnik DP, 26 November 2015).

[14] Fair Work Act s.789FF(1).

[15] South Eastern Sydney Local Health District v Lal [2019] FWCFB 1475 (Hatcher VP, Sams DP, Hampton C, 7 March 2019) at para. 27.

[16] ibid.

[17] Fair Work Act s.789FF(2).

[18] Revised Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013 at para. 123.

[19] Fair Work Act s.789FH.

[20] Fair Work Act s.789FF(2)(a).

[21] Revised Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013 at para. 88.

[22] Re Ms LP [2016] FWC 763 (Hampton C, 12 February 2016) at para. 4; citing Re Ms LP [2015] FWC 6602 (Hampton C, 4 November 2015) at para. 195.

Updated time

Last updated

02 October 2019

 

 

Bookmark/Search this post

Facebook logo Google+ logo Twitter logo

 

Page feedback

Did you find what you were looking for?

Please note: If you would like a response to your question, please contact us or lodge a complaint. This feedback is only about content on this page and will be used to improve website usability. The comments are not monitored for personal information or workplace complaints. 

Mini sites

  • Annual Report 2013–14
    • Reader's guide
    • 1. Overview
      • President's introduction
      • General Manager's overview
      • Performance summary
      • Major achievements 2013–14
    • 2. About the Commission
      • Who we are and what we do
      • Our structure
      • Outcome and program structure
      • Our clients and stakeholders
        • In focus—Small Business Outreach
      • Our future direction
        • In focus–New website
        • In focus–Virtual tour
        • In focus–Mock hearings
      • Our history
    • 3. Performance reporting
      • Overview
      • Legislative amendments
      • Workload
      • Timeliness benchmarks
      • Resolving disputes
      • Determining unfair dismissal applications
      • Setting the minimum wage
        • In focus–Pay Equity Unit
      • Orders relating to industrial action
        • Case study–Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
        • Case study–Sydney Water
      • Processes relating to modern awards
        • In focus–4 yearly review of awards
      • Approving agreements
        • Case study–Catholic Education Victoria
        • Case study–Orora Fibre Packaging
      • Regulating registered organisations
      • Determining anti-bullying applications
        • In focus–Setting up the anti-bullying jurisdiction
        • Case study–Anti-bullying
      • Key performance indicators
    • 4. Management and accountability
      • Corporate governance
      • Planning and development
      • Ethical standards
      • Accountability
      • Our workforce
      • Employee pay and entitlements
      • Service Charter, complaints and Code of Conduct
      • Financial management
    • 5. Appendices
      • A | Member activities
      • B | List of Members
      • C | Panel assignments
      • D | Methodology for Chart 2–Matters dealt with by the Commission and its predecessors 1998–99 to 2013–14
      • E | Promoting fairness and improving access
      • F | Efficiency and innovation
      • G | Increasing accountability
      • H | Productivity and engaging with industry
      • I | Documents relating to the work of the Commission
      • J | Fair Work Commission addresses
      • K | Lodgment and case load statistics
      • L | Methodology for Chart 6–Number of Commission sittings, various
      • M | Subscription services
      • N | Information on specific statutory requirements
      • O | Fraud Control Certificate
      • P | Fair Work Commission Service Charter
      • Q | Financial statements
        • Independent Audit Report
        • Statement by the General Manager and Chief Financial Officer
        • Statement of Comprehensive Income
        • Statement of Financial Position
        • Statement of Changes in Equity
        • Cash Flow Statement
        • Schedule of Commitments
        • Schedule of Administered Items
        • Notes to the financial statements
          • Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
          • Note 2: Events after the Reporting Period
          • Note 3: Expenses
          • Note 4: Income
          • Note 5: Fair Value Measurements
          • Note 6: Financial Assets
          • Note 7: Non-financial Assets
          • Note 8: Payables
          • Note 9: Provisions
          • Note 10: Cash Flow Reconciliation
          • Note 11: Contingent Liabilities and Assets
          • Note 12: Senior Executive Remuneration
          • Note 13: Remuneration of Auditors
          • Note 14: Financial Instruments
          • Note 15: Financial Assets Reconciliation
          • Note 16: Administered Income
          • Note 17: Administered Payables
          • Note 18: Administered Cash Flow Reconciliation
          • Note 19: Administered Contingent Liabilities and Assets
          • Note 20: Appropriations
          • Note 21: Compliance with Statutory Conditions for Payments from the Consolidated Revenue Fund
          • Note 22: Compensation and Debt Relief
          • Note 23: Reporting of Outcomes
          • Note 24: Net Cash Appropriation Arrangements
      • R | Agency resource statement
      • S | Expenses and resources for outcome
      • T | Glossary
      • U | Acronyms and abbreviations
      • V | List of requirements
    • Letter of transmittal
    • Inquiries and copyright
    • Videos
    • Downloads
  • Annual Report 2014–15
    • Introduction
    • Preliminary information
      • Contents
      • Letter of transmittal
      • Readers guide
    • Part 1 Overview
      • President's introduction
      • General Manager's overview
      • Performance summary
      • Major achievements
    • Part 2 About the Commission
      • Outcome and programme structure
      • Who we are and what we do
      • Our structure
      • Our history
      • Our clients and stakeholders
      • Our future direction
      • Future directions - Continuing the change program
    • Part 3 Performance reporting
      • Overview
      • Legislative amendments
      • Workload
      • Timeliness benchmarks
      • Resolving disputes
      • Unlawful termination disputes
      • Determining unfair dismissal applications
      • Setting the minimum wage
      • Orders relating to industrial action
      • Processes relating to modern awards
      • Enterprise agreements
      • Determining anti-bullying applications
      • Regulating registered organisations
      • Key performance indicators
    • Part 4 Management and accountability
      • Corporate governance
      • Planning and development
      • Workplace health and safety
      • Business continuity
      • Ethical standards
      • Fair Work Commission values
      • Freedom of information
      • Accountability
      • The Commission's workforce
      • Employee pay and entitlements
      • Service Charter, complaints and code of conduct
      • Financial management
      • Agency resource statement
      • Expenses and resources for outcome
    • Acronyms and abbreviations
    • Part 5 Appendices
      • Appendix A
      • Appendix B
      • Appendix C
      • Appendix D
      • Appendix E
      • Appendix F
      • Appendix G
      • Appendix H
      • Appendix I
      • Appendix J
      • Appendix K
      • Appendix L
      • Appendix M
      • Appendix N
      • Glossary
  • Annual Report 2015–16
    • Preliminary information
      • Letter of transmittal
      • Readers' guide
    • Part 1: Overview
      • President's report
      • General Manager's report
    • Part 2: About the Commission
    • Part 3: Performance
      • Performance summary
      • Annual performance statements 2015–16
      • Operational performance
        • Applications lodged
        • Hearings & conferences
        • Information & assistance
        • Major application types
          • Unfair dismissals
          • General protections & unlawful termination disputes
          • Anti-bullying
          • Enterprise agreements
          • Resolving disputes
          • Industrial action
        • New Approaches
        • Setting the minimum wage
        • Modern awards
        • Regulating registered organisations
        • Appeals
      • Significant decisions
      • Case studies
        • Case study: Enterprise agreements pilot
        • Case study: Patrick & the MUA
        • Case study: Encouraging regulatory compliance
    • Part 4: Management & accountability
      • Corporate governance
      • Financial management
      • Other mandatory information
    • Appendices
      • Appendix A: List of Members
      • Appendix B: Panel assignments
      • Appendix C: Member activities
      • Appendix D: Lodgment & case load statistics
      • Appendix E: Registered organisations data
      • Appendix F: Performance reporting for the RSRT
      • Appendix G: Financial statements
      • Appendix H: Subscription services
      • Appendix I: Service charter
      • Appendix J: List of requirements
      • Appendix K: Expense & resources outcome, agency resource statement & financial performance analysis
    • Glossary
    • Acronyms & abbreviations
    • Contact us
  • Annual Wage Review 2013–14
  • Anti-bullying benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Overview of benchbook
    • What is workplace bullying?
    • Who is covered by workplace bullying laws?
      • Definition of ‘worker’
      • Definition of ‘constitutionally-covered business’
        • What is a person conducting a business or undertaking?
        • What is a Territory or a Commonwealth place?
        • What is a constitutional corporation?
        • What is the Commonwealth?
    • When is a worker bullied at work?
      • What does ‘at work’ mean?
      • Risk of continued bullying
      • Reasonable management action
    • Making an application
    • Responding to an application
    • If the worker has been dismissed
    • Commission processes
      • Procedural issues
      • Representation by lawyers and paid agents
    • Evidence
    • Outcomes
      • Dismissing an application
      • Contravening an order of the Commission
    • Associated applications
      • Costs
      • Appeals
      • Role of the Court
  • Corporate Plan 2018–19
    • 1. Message from the General Manager
    • 2. Purpose
    • 3. Operating environment
    • 4. Culture
    • 5. Capability
    • 6. Performance
  • Corporate Plan 2019–20
    • 1. Message from the General Manager
    • 2. Purpose
    • 3. Operating environment
    • 4. Our focus
    • 5. Culture
    • 6. Capability
    • 7. Performance
  • Corporate Plan 2020-21
    • 1. Message from the General Manager
    • 2. Purpose
    • 3. Operating environment
    • 4. Key activities
    • 5. Capability
    • 6. Risk
    • 7. Performance
  • Enterprise agreements benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Overview of benchbook
    • What is an enterprise agreement?
      • Single-enterprise agreement
      • Multi-enterprise agreement
      • Differences between single and multi-enterprise agreements
      • Greenfields agreement
    • Content of an enterprise agreement
      • Permitted matters
      • Coverage
      • Scope – who will be covered?
      • Terms & conditions of employment
      • Base rate of pay
      • Nominal expiry date
      • Mandatory terms
      • Flexibility term
      • Consultation term
      • Dispute settlement term
      • Optional terms
      • Terms that cannot be included
        • Terms that exclude the NES
        • Unlawful terms
        • Designated outworker terms
    • Agreement making process
      • Representation
      • Employee right to be represented
      • Bargaining representatives
    • Bargaining
      • Good faith bargaining
      • How long does bargaining take?
    • Voting
      • Voting process
      • Who can vote?
      • Timeframe for vote
      • Voting methods
      • When is an agreement made?
      • If parties cannot agree
    • Making an application
      • Common defects & issues
        • National Employment Standards
        • Better off overall test
        • Mandatory terms
        • Other terms
        • Pre-approval requirements
        • Forms & lodgment
      • Who must apply
      • Timeframe to apply
      • Material to accompany application
      • Signing an agreement
      • Employer must notify employees
    • Commission approval process
      • Genuine agreement
        • Minor procedural or technical errors
      • Where a scope order is in operation
      • Particular kinds of employees
      • Better off overall test (BOOT)
        • When an agreement passes
        • Classes of employees
        • Which award applies
        • Advice about coverage
        • Loaded rates of pay
      • Public interest test
      • Undertakings
      • Powers of the Commission
    • Associated applications
      • Majority support determinations
      • Authorisations to commence bargaining
        • Single interest employer authorisations
        • Ministerial declaration
        • Low-paid authorisations
      • Scope orders
      • Bargaining orders
      • Serious breach declarations
      • Disputes
      • Workplace determinations
        • Low-paid
        • Industrial action related
        • Bargaining related
      • Role of the Court
      • Appeals
      • Varying enterprise agreements
        • Varying by agreement
        • Ambiguity or uncertainty
        • Discrimination
      • Terminating enterprise agreements
        • Terminating by agreement
        • After its nominal expiry date
      • Terminating individual agreements
  • General Manager reporting requirements
  • General protections benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Overview of benchbook
      • When is a person covered by the general protections?
    • What are the general protections?
    • How do the general protections work?
      • Rebuttable presumption as to reason or intent
    • Coverage for general protections
      • What is a constitutionally-covered entity?
      • What is a Territory or a Commonwealth place?
      • What is a trade and commerce employer?
      • What is a Territory employer?
      • What is a national system employer?
    • What if I am not covered?
    • What is adverse action?
      • What is dismissal?
      • Injuring employee in their employment
      • Altering the position of the employee
      • Discriminating
      • Threatened action and organisation of action
      • Exclusions
    • Workplace rights protections
      • Meaning of workplace right
      • Coercion
      • Undue influence or pressure
      • Misrepresentations
      • Requiring the use of COVIDSafe
    • Industrial activities protections
      • What are industrial activities?
      • Coercion
      • Misrepresentations
      • Inducements – membership action
    • Other protections
      • Discrimination
        • Race
        • Colour
        • Gender identity & sexual orientation
        • Age
        • Physical or mental disability
        • Marital status
        • Family or carer’s responsibilities
        • Pregnancy
        • Religion
        • Political opinion
        • National extraction
        • Social origin
      • Exceptions
      • Temporary absence – illness or injury
      • Bargaining services fees
      • Coverage by particular instruments
      • Coercion – allocation of duties to particular person
    • Sham arrangements
      • Misrepresenting employment
      • Dismissing to engage as independent contractor
      • Misrepresentation to engage as independent contractor
    • Making an application
      • Dismissal applications
        • Timeframe for lodgment
        • Extension of time for lodging an application
      • Non-dismissal applications
      • Other types of applications
        • Multiple actions relating to dismissal
        • Unfair dismissal
        • Unlawful termination
        • Court application
        • Discrimination
    • Power to dismiss applications
    • Evidence
    • Commission process
      • Conferences & hearings
      • Dealing with different types of general protections disputes
      • Rescheduling or adjourning matters
      • Representation by lawyers and paid agents
      • Bias
    • Outcomes
    • Costs
      • When are costs ordered by the Commission?
      • Costs against representatives
    • Appeals
    • Role of the Court
      • Enforcement of Commission orders
      • Types of order made by the Court
  • Industrial action benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • What is industrial action?
      • Unprotected industrial action
        • Orders to stop or prevent unprotected industrial action
      • Protected industrial action
        • Immunity
        • Common requirements
        • Employee claim action
        • Employer response action
        • Employee response action
        • Pattern bargaining
    • Taking protected industrial action
      • Protected action ballots
        • Who may apply?
        • Making an application
        • Commission process
        • Varying a protected action ballot order
        • Revoking a protected action ballot order
      • Voting
        • Ballot agents
        • Who may vote – roll of voters
        • Ballot papers
        • Voting procedure
        • Scrutiny of the ballot
        • Results of the ballot
        • When is industrial action authorised?
      • Notice requirements
      • Commencing protected industrial action
    • Payments relating to industrial action
      • Partial work bans
      • Unprotected industrial action – payments
      • Standing down employees
    • Suspension or termination of protected industrial action
      • Powers of the Commission
        • When the Commission may suspend or terminate
        • When the Commission must suspend or terminate
          • Threats to persons or the economy
          • Suspending industrial action
        • Requirements relating to a period of suspension
      • Powers of the Minister
    • Enforcement
    • Appeals
  • JobKeeper benchbook
    • Glossary
    • Introduction
      • Provisions of the Fair Work Act
    • JobKeeper enabling directions – general
      • Service & entitlement accrual
      • When a JobKeeper enabling direction will have no effect
      • Stand downs that are not jobkeeper enabling stand downs
      • Employee requests
    • Jobkeeper enabling stand down directions – entitled employers
      • Directions about duties & location of work
    • Jobkeeper enabling directions – legacy employers
      • Jobkeeper enabling stand down directions – legacy employers
      • Directions about duties & location of work – legacy employers
      • Termination of a jobkeeper enabling direction – legacy employers
    • Agreements about days or times of work
      • Agreements about days or times of work – entitled employers
      • Agreements about days or times of work – legacy employers
      • Termination of an agreement about days or times of work
    • Employer payment obligations
      • Wage condition
      • Minimum payment guarantee
      • Hourly rate of pay guarantee
    • Agreements about annual leave
    • Protections
    • Disputes we cannot assist with
    • Applications to deal with a dispute
      • Who can make an application
      • Responding to an application
      • Objecting to an application
      • Discontinuing an application
    • Commission process
      • General information
      • Conferences & hearings
      • Procedural issues
    • Evidence
    • Outcomes
      • Contravening an order
      • Appeals
      • Role of the Court
    • Attachments
  • Modern Awards Review 2012
    • Introduction
      • Modern Awards Review 2012
  • Sir Richard Kirby Archives
    • Home
    • Sir Richard Kirby
    • About the Archives
    • Cases
      • Case
      • The Honourable Justice Henry Bournes Higgins (1851–1929)
    • Centenary
    • Exhibitions
      • Exhibition launch: The history of the Australian minimum wage
      • Guide – Opening Exhibition
      • International Industrial Dispute Resolution Conference
        • Speaker – Justice Alan Boulton AO
        • Speaker – Mr Arthur F Rosenfeld
        • Speaker – Mr Craig Smith
        • Speaker – Mr James Wilson
        • Speaker – Mr Kieran Mulvey
        • Speaker – Mr Peter Anderson
        • Speaker – Ms Ginette Brazeau
        • Speaker – Ms Nerine Kahn
        • Speaker – Ms Rita Donaghy CBE
        • Speaker – Ms Sharan Burrow
        • Speaker – Senator Guy Barnett
        • Speaker – The Hon. Julia Gillard
      • The Journey
        • Court
          • Early years
          • New court
            • Profile of Justice O'Connor
            • First registration of an industrial organisation
          • Judges & conciliators
          • The Boilermakers' Case
            • The dispute & appeals
        • Commission
          • Post Boilermakers 1956-1973
          • Hawke & Keating governments
            • Industrial Relations Court
          • Howard Government
        • Fair Work Australia
          • The Fair Work system
          • About Fair Work Australia
          • Transition
          • Fair Work timeline
      • The history of the Australian minimum wage
        • The Great Strikes
        • The first minimum wage: The Victorian minimum wage
        • The Harvester Decision
        • The impact of the Great Depression
        • Working it out: Cost of living versus capacity to pay
        • The removal of award rate discrimination
        • The wage explosion & economic crisis
        • The modern era: The development of a modern minimum wage
      • Treasures of the archives
        • Launch speech?Treasures of the Archives
        • 1. Professor Isaac
        • 2. Register of organisations
        • 3. Perlman letters
        • 4. Sir Richard Kirby photograph
        • 5. Oral history program
        • 6. AIRC sign
        • 7. Folder of wage decisions
        • 8. Centenary exhibition
        • 9. Women's exhibition poster
        • 10. Isaac letters
    • The modern era
    • Past Presidents
    • Past Members
      • Past Members 1956 to present
      • Past Members to 1956
  • Unfair dismissals benchbook
    • Overview of unfair dismissal
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Coverage for unfair dismissal
      • Who is protected from unfair dismissal?
      • People excluded from national unfair dismissal laws
        • Independent contractors
        • Labour hire workers
        • Vocational placements & volunteers
        • Public sector employment
      • Constitutional corporations
      • High income threshold
      • Modern award coverage
      • Application of an enterprise agreement
      • What is the minimum period of employment?
        • How do you calculate the minimum period of employment?
        • What is continuous service?
        • What is an excluded period?
      • Bankruptcy
      • Insolvency
    • What is dismissal?
      • When does a dismissal take effect?
      • Terminated at the employer's initiative
      • Forced resignation
      • Demotion
      • Contract for a specified period of time
      • Contract for a specified task
      • Contract for a specified season
      • Training arrangement
      • What is a transfer of employment?
      • Periods of service as a casual employee
      • What is a genuine redundancy?
        • Job no longer required due to changes in operational requirements
        • Consultation obligations
        • Redeployment
      • What is the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code?
    • What makes a dismissal unfair?
      • Valid reason relating to capacity or conduct
        • Capacity
        • Conduct
      • Notification of reason for dismissal
      • Opportunity to respond
      • Unreasonable refusal of a support person
      • Warnings – unsatisfactory performance
      • Size of employer's enterprise and human resources specialists
      • Other relevant matters
    • Making an application
      • Application fee
      • Timeframe for lodgment
      • Extension of time for lodging an application
      • Who is the employer?
      • Multiple actions
      • Discontinuing an application
    • Objecting to an application
    • Commission process
      • Conciliation
      • Hearings and conferences
      • Preparing for hearings and conferences
      • Representation by lawyers and paid agents
      • Rescheduling or adjourning matters
      • Bias
    • Remedies
      • Reinstatement
        • Order for reinstatement cannot be subject to conditions
        • Order to maintain continuity
        • Order to restore lost pay
      • Compensation
        • Calculating compensation
        • Mitigation
        • Remuneration
        • Other relevant matters
        • Compensation cap
        • Instalments
    • Dismissing an application
    • Evidence
    • Costs
      • Costs against representatives
      • Security for costs
    • Appeals
      • Staying decisions
    • Role of the Court
  • Waltzing Matilda and the Sunshine Harvester Factory
    • Introduction
    • The book
      • Book launch
    • The film
      • Film launch
    • Historical material
      • 38 Hour Week Wage Principle [1983]
      • 40 Hour Week Case [1947]
      • 44 Hour Week Case [1927]
      • Apprenticeship indentures
      • Australian Minimum Wage and fitter (trades) rate since 1906
      • Boot Trades Case
      • Careers in Bootmaking and Boot Repairing
      • Cattle Industry Case 1966
      • Commercial Printing Case [1936]
      • Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
      • Cost of living newspaper articles from the early 1900s
      • Debates
      • Equal Pay Case 1969
      • Equal Pay Case 1972
      • Fruit Pickers Case
      • Gas Employees Case
      • Graph of Australian Minimum Wage since 1906
      • Harvester Case
      • Historic case judgments on the Fair Work Commission's website
      • Kingston's evidence
      • Linesmen's Case
      • Maternity Leave Case [1979]
      • Metal trades base level minimum wages [1967–2015]
      • Methods of wage adjustment
        • Establishing an Australian Minimum Wage 1907?1922
          • The origins of the Australian minimum wage
          • The 'needs' principle and 'capacity to pay'
          • Women's wages
          • First indexation decision
        • Quarterly indexation 1922–1953
        • The Great Depression 1931
        • Prosperity loadings 1937
        • World War II 1939–1945
        • The post-war period: 1953–1965 basic wage inquiries
        • The total wage 1966–1967
        • Removal of discrimination in award rates
        • Reintroduction of quarterly wage indexation 1975–1978
        • Six monthly wage indexation 1978–1981
        • Wage explosion 1981–1982
        • Reforming awards and work and management practices 1987–1991
        • Six monthly wage indexation 1983–1987
        • Enterprise bargaining and a minimum wage safety net 1991–1996
        • Statutory adjustments
        • The minimum wage in real terms
      • Mrs Beeton's cookbook
      • Paternity Leave Case [1990]
      • Personal/Carer's Leave Test Case [1995]
      • Piddington report
      • Re Bagshaw [1907]
      • Significant cases on the Fair Work Commission's website
      • Statistics for the purpose of comparison with the Australian minimum wage
      • The Amalgamated Society of Engineers v. The Adelaide Steam-ship Company Limited and Others
      • The Australian minimum wage from 1906
      • The Federated Marine Stewards and Pantrymen's Association v. The Commonwealth Steamship Owners' Association and Others
      • The Victorian minimum wage 1896
        • Legislative Council Second Reading Speech to the Factories and Shops Bill 1896
      • The first Award: 1906 Steam-ship Crew
      • 100 years of the minimum wage—Statistical comparison
    • Mrs Beeton's cookbook
    • Glossary
    • Related sites
    • Educational materials
  • AWRS First Findings report

Footer

  • Site map
  • Legal
  • Copyright
  • Accessibility

Coronavirus (COVID-19) information